Will John Ternus make Apple great again?
An in-depth perspective on Apple's engineering transition, product vision, and leadership succession.
The Sunrise State Staff
•
How the revised CBFC guidelines will sanitize Indian cinema
The new film certification rules disguise moral policing as regulation, threatening the raw storytelling that defines modern Indian cinema.
The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting has officially replaced the 1991 film certification framework with restrictive new guidelines. By heavily policing on-screen violence, political commentary, and perceived vulgarity, these updated rules will effectively sanitize Indian cinema, stifling creative freedom under the guise of protecting public sensibilities.
For decades, the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) has operated more as a censorship board than a neutral certification body. This new framework arms the state with even broader, more ambiguous tools to mandate cuts. By insisting that filmmakers avoid the "glorification" of violence, graphic sexual content, and anything that could be interpreted as "defamatory" to courts or the state, the government is essentially demanding a conflict-free, sterile version of reality on the big screen.
The severity of these revisions becomes obvious when looking at the specific parameters now governing cinematic expression:
- Suppression of political critique: Content that questions sovereignty, endangers public order, or creates "disregard" for courts is restricted, which threatens to neutralize the socio-political thriller genre entirely.
- Puritanical dialogue mandates: The retention of bans on "double meanings" and language appealing to "baser instincts" gives examiners arbitrary power over regional slang and authentic character dialogue.
- Sanitization of violence: A blanket directive against "excessive or entertainment-driven violence" directly threatens the dominant, high-octane action genres currently driving the domestic box office.
The fundamental flaw in the 2026 guidelines is the paternalistic assumption that the Indian audience is inherently fragile and incapable of separating cinematic fiction from real-world morality. Cinephiles and filmmakers are rightfully voicing their outrage, recognizing that a film industry cannot thrive when it is terrified of its own shadow.
When a government institution demands that art only reflect a sanitized, inoffensive utopia, it is not protecting the public—it is lobotomizing the culture. If multiplexes are forced to screen only heavily censored, state-approved narratives, the audience will simply abandon theaters for the unrestricted freedom of the internet.
